Legal Opinion

United States v. Berg

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 7, 1990No. 62,139; NMCM 87 3466PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court on Reconsideration

COX, Judge:

The United States has petitioned this Court for reconsideration of our decision in United States v. Berg, 30 MJ 195 (CMA 1990), where we agreed with the Court of Military Review1 that the evidence regard*39ing an unpremeditated murder charge was insufficient to support a finding that the accused’s conduct was “inherently dangerous to others and evince[d] a wanton disregard of human life” under Article 118(3), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 918(3). An instruction given to the members on that theory was, therefore, prejudicial error.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MaloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Darry v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  4. United States v. JuddUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  5. Radej v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  2. United States v. ValdezU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  3. United States v. BergCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  4. United States v. CowanU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
  5. United States v. McMonagleU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API