United States v. Campbell
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
PER CURIAM. SULLIVAN, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
ON RECONSIDERATION
2Per curiam
I
The Government has filed a petition for reconsideration, requesting clarification of our opinion at 50 MJ 154 (1999). Appellant contends that the petition should be rejected because the requested clarification would constitute an advisory opinion. Answer at 3. We disagree.
The present appeal involves an actual case and controversy between two opposing parties "with concrete, adverse interests as to the validity of a conviction under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Although we are not required to articulate reasons for our decision, the issuance of reasoned opinions…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. HarperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. FordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. ChisholmCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. BarnesNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
- United States v. TannerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
- United States v. BarnesNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.