Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1993No. 92-2536PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings but not the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months. Costs taxed to the respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

*372Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Wright and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents with opinion. Resnick, J., dissents and would follow the panel’s recommendation that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for one year. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would suspend respondent for two years, but would stay the suspension during respondent’s good behavior.

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Attorney CSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  4. In re Andrew J. KlineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. In Re JordanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API