In re Andrew J. Kline
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Chief Judge:
This matter comes before us upon the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”). The Board recommended that a 30-day suspension be given to Andrew J. Kline (“Kline”) after finding that Kline violated Rule 3.8(e) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct (“Rule 3.8(e)”). Rule 3.8(e) prohibits a prosecutor in a criminal case from intentionally failing to disclose to the defense any evidence or information that the prosecutor knows or reasonably should know tends to negate the guilt of the accused. Bar Counsel takes…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. DavilaWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- In re: Tyler James LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- KEVIN YOUNG v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- In Re: Ronald SeastrunkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
- In Re Barry DowneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.