Legal Opinion

Masseth v. Johnston

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided January 15, 1894No. 8, Nov. Term, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Benjamin Mjisseth against Johnston Bros. & Stanfield for infringement of a patent. Decree for complainant.

1Opinion of the Court

BTJFFIHGTOH, District Judge.

This is a bill in equity for an accounting for alleged infringement of letters patent Ho. 167,400, for improvement in packers for shutting off water from oil and gas wells, granted April 21, 1875, to James P. Gordon, and assigned to complainant, Beniamin Masseth. The answer admits the use at the time of filing, and for two years previous thereto, by the respondents. of what is known as the “I'aim Device,” but denies infringement thereby, and further denies the patentability of Gordon’s device. Since answer filed, this court has sustained the Gordon patent, (Masseth…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Campbell Printing-Press & Manuf'g Co. v. Manhattan Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1892
  2. Untermeyer v. FreundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1893
  3. Masseth v. PalmU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. Roberts v. WalleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beacon Folding MacH. Co. v. Rotary MacH. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927
  2. Armstrong v. Allen B. Du Mont Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1955
  3. Los Angeles Art Organ Co. v. Æolian Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
  4. Masseth v. ReiberU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1894
  5. Wilson v. Union Tool Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API