Legal Opinion

Untermeyer v. Freund

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 17, 1893PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. In Equity. Bill by Henry Untermeyer against Max Freund for infringement of a design patent. The circuit court rendered a decree for complainant, (50 Fed. Rep. 77,) arid defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

SHIPMAN, Circuit Judge.

The bill in equity in this case was brought in the circuit court for the southern district of New York, against Max Freund and Adolph S. Freund, to restrain the alleged infringement of design letters patent No. 15,121, applied for May 8, 1884, dated July 1, 1884, to Henry Untermeyer, for a design for watch, cases. The circuit court entered an interlocutory decree ordering an injunction against the defendants, and an accounting, and upon the return of the master’s report overruled the defendants’ exceptions thereto, confirmed the report, and entered a final decree…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Garretson v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Smith v. Whitman Saddle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Stevens v. GladdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  4. Clark Thread Co. v. Willimantic Linen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Marsh v. Nichols, Shepard & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bergstrom v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1980
  2. Taylor v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1924
  3. Toledo Metal Wheel Co. v. Foyer Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  4. Britton v. White Manuf'g Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1894
  5. Masseth v. JohnstonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API