Legal Opinion

Masseth v. Palm

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided August 19, 1892No. 16PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Iii Equity. Suit for infringement of patent. Heard on pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Buffington, District Judge.

This bill is filed by Benjamin Masseth, assignee of James P. Gordon, against George Palm, for alleged infringement of patent No. 167,400, issued September 7, 1875, for an improvement in packers in shutting off water from oil wells. In drilling such wells veins of saltwater are met at great depth, which must be shut off, or the well will be ruined. Before the patent in suit this was done by running an iron pipe called “casing,” from the surface to a point below the salt-water vein. Here it rested on the bottom of the well, and by means .of a packer kept the water…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morley Sewing MacHine Co. v. LancasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Comptograph Co. v. Mechanical Accountant Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906
  2. Powell v. Leicester Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1901
  3. Masseth v. JohnstonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Hall Mammoth Incubator Co. v. TeaboutDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1913
  5. Masseth v. LarkinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API