Legal Opinion
In Re a Suspended Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Brady
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided September 24, 1996No. SB-96-0003-D. Disc. Comm. Nos. 91-1753, 92-0011, 92-0605, 92-0758, 92-0789, 92-0979, 92-0932, 92-1009 and 93-0689PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Chief Justice.
The Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona (Commission) adopted the recommendation of the hearing officer that Michael James Brady (Respondent) be disbarred from the practice of law and make restitution totaling $12,850 to five clients. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 53(e), Rules of the Supreme Court.
We consider three questions on appeal:
1. Did Respondent violate the Arizona Rules of Professional Conduct?
2. Was Respondent denied due process because he had no opportunity personally to confront the witnesses against him?
3. Are the sanctions…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- In Re LewkowitzArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, CardenasArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- In re CurtisArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re PeasleyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- In the Matter of Lisa M. AubuchonArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re WalkerArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re ZawadaArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re AbramsArizona Supreme Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.