Legal Opinion

Prenderville v. Sinclair

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 12, 2016No. AC36931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*338 MULLINS, J.

*441 The plaintiffs, Charles Prenderville, individually and as administrator of the estate of Corey *442 Prenderville, and Alice Prenderville, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their action against the defendants, Christopher Sinclair, a neurologist, and River Valley Neurology, LLC. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly (1) denied their motion to amend the return date, and (2) granted the defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We disagree, and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The record reveals the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Rocco v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Coppola v. CoppolaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Rogozinski v. American Food Service Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jackson v. PrinceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API