Sobczak v. Board of Education
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTEMA, J.
The plaintiff John Sobczak1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, following a jury trial, in favor of the defendants, the board of education of the city of Meriden (board) and Elizabeth Ruocco.2 Although the plaintiff raises multiple claims of instructional and evidentiary error, the dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff failed to exhaust the grievance procedure set forth in the collective bargaining agreement (agreement) between the board and the Meriden federation of municipal employees. We conclude that he did, thereby depriving the court of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Perodeau v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Mendillo v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- LaCroix v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- O & G Industries, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Garcia v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Santana v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Caltabiano v. L & L Real Estate Holdings II, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Bartha v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Court of Appeals · 2005
- Sobczak v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005