Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Board of Public Works

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1942No. Civ. 13008PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DESMOND, J. pro tem.

Appellant filed a petition for a peremptory writ of mandate to be directed to respondents, “ordering and commanding the respondent Board of Public *458Works of the City of Los Angeles to reinstate the petitioner to the position of Superintendent of Street Maintenance, Bureau of Engineering, Department of Public Works of the City of Los Angeles, and to permit him to perform the duties of said position and to restore to him all the rights incident to said position and to cause demands and pay cheeks to be issued to said petitioner for the amount of salary or wages due the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Souder v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Haddad v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Boyd v. PendegastCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Nider v. City CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Jones v. O'TooleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Redwood Theatres, Inc. v. City of ModestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Strother v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Doctor v. Lakeridge Constr. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API