Legal Opinion

Jones v. O'Toole

California Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1923No. S. F. No. 10414PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, C. J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the respondents, as members of the Civil Service Commission of the city and county of San Francisco, to restore the petitioner to his alleged proper rank on the eligible list of patrolmen eligible for promotion to the position of corporal in the police department and to certify him to the police commission of said city and county of San Francisco ■for promotion to the position of corporal in the police service of said city.

The Board of Civil Service Commissioners, on August 3, 1920, made a list of persons eligible fof promotion to the office of…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Graham v. SchmidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. State v. S.C. S.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Perry v. O'FarrellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  5. Cook v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API