Legal Opinion
Catucci v. Ouellette
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 18, 1991No. 9449PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiffs, Alfred Catucci and his son, Thomas Catucci, instituted a two count complaint against the defendant claiming, first, a violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA)1 and, second, a fraudulent nondisclosure in connection with a real estate transaction. After a trial to the court, a judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs on both counts, and the defendant appealed.
The trial court found the following facts. On January 11, 1988, the defendant placed an advertisement in the Bristol Press offering for sale lot forty-nine on Lakeshore Drive in the town of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Miller v. ApplebySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Franchey v. HannesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Bombero v. MarchionneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Peterson v. BraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Tanpiengco v. TastoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Aldin Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Hess Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Devito v. Defrancesco, No. Cv 99 0171842s (Aug. 4, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
- Fernandes v. McManus, No. Cv95-0381135-S (Nov. 12, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.