Legal Opinion

Bombero v. Marchionne

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 7, 1987No. 5342PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.

After a trial to a jury on the issue of damages, the plaintiff1 was awarded $12,184.47.2 The plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict as inadequate was denied. On appeal he claims that the court erred (1) in precluding his treating orthopedic surgeon from giving an opinion as to whether the plaintiff’s injuries would preclude him from carrying out his work duties in twenty years, (2) in failing to charge the jury as to diminished earning capacity, (3) in charging the jury on the plaintiff’s life expectancy without adequate explanation, (4) in excluding evidence of the costs of towing the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. RoqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Canaan Oil & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. State v. BeltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Shelnitz v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Daigle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. Marchell v. WhelchelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Catucci v. OuelletteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  4. Bombero v. MarchionneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Byrne v. Avery Center for Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API