Legal Opinion
State v. Dedman
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided November 17, 2004No. 28,261PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Justice.
{1} The State appeals from an unpublished opinion of the Court of Appeals, State v. Dedman, No. 23,476 (N.M.Ct.App. Aug. 8, 2003), affirming an order suppressing evidence of a blood alcohol test in a prosecution for aggravated driving while under the influence of intoxicating drugs (DWI), contrary to NMSA 1978, § 66-8-102(D) (1999, prior to 2003 & 2004 amendments). The Court of Appeals concluded that the State had failed to lay an adequate foundation for admission of the report because it did not offer proof that Defendant’s blood was drawn using the veni-puncture…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Horton v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- State v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- State v. GomezTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. SaucierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Commonwealth v. VasquezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Hinojos-Mendoza v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.