Legal Opinion
Hager v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 4, 1986No. C5-85-1678PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant Jason D. Hager’s driving privileges were revoked pursuant to the implied consent law. He petitioned for judicial review and the trial court sustained the revocation. We affirm.
FACTS
On March 24,1985, at approximately 2:22 a.m., Officer James Thorstad was eastbound on Brooklyn Boulevard near Regency Avenue in Brooklyn Park, when he observed Hager’s vehicle which had one headlight out and no visible rear license plate. Thorstad stopped Hager’s vehicle, and asked for his driver’s license. While talking to him, Thorstad observed that Hager’s eyes were bloodshot and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. DilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Holtz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- Tate v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Noren v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. KlamarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Melin v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Johnson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Ruffenach v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Schulz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.