Legal Opinion

Juan Jose Medrano v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 26, 1963No. 18305_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a refusal of the district court to set aside judgments and sentences in the case of Medrano v. United States, 9 Cir., 1960, 285 F.2d 23, in a proceeding brought below under Section 2255, Title 28, United States Code.

Appellant, charged with five violations of Section 174 of Title 21, United States Code, involving narcotics, and found guilty, urges that there was no proof of “illegal importation,” and thus that a jurisdictional fact was lacking that can be raised at any time, even after the finality of the original judgment of conviction. There was no proof there was or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Frank Anthony Cellino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  3. Juan Jose Medrano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  4. Pitta v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  5. Louis Fiano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Roy Arthur NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. Brian Edward RatiganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. State v. BuchananNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Robert S. Egger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. John T. Dirring v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API