United States v. Ross
Supreme Court of the United States
Appeal from the Court of Claims.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Strong
It is incumbent upon a claimant under the Captured or Abandoned Property Act to establish by sufficient proof that the property ' captured or abandoned came into the hands of a treasury agent; that it was sold; that the proceeds of the sale were paid into the treasury of the United States; and that he was the owner of the property, and entitled to the proceeds thereof. All this is essential to show that the United States is a trustee for him, holding his money. That there is in the treasury a fund arisen out of the sales of property captured or abandoned, a fund held in trust for somebody,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. CrusellSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
3Cited by231 opinions
- Jones v. BalesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1972
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. SummersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Mann v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
226 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.