Legal Opinion
Frank Anthony Cellino v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 14, 1960No. 16178PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge.
Appellant, Frank Anthony Cellino, was found guilty by a jury of selling and facilitating the sale of heroin, knowing the heroin to have been imported into the United States contrary to law, in violation of Title 21 U.S.C.A. § 174. 1 The indictment named appellant and one Joe Bruno as defendants, appellant being charged under one count and Bruno under four counts.
Appellant having been found guilty by the jury, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the Government. Appellant’s participation in the offense may be summarized as follows:
Raymond…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Masciale v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Stoppelli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Jesse James Gilbert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Alfredo Delgado Arellanes and Geneva Arellanes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Bernardino Chirez Hernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Henry Rodella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.