Legal Opinion

Pitta v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 3, 1947No. 11619PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was convicted of a violation of the Jones-Miller Act, § 2, 21 U.S.C.A. § 174. The indictment charged that he and one Bruno fraudulently and knowingly concealed and facilitated the concealment of a quantity of a morphine derivative, namely, one bindle containing a dram of heroin, which had been imported into the United States contrary to law, as the accused well knew.

The evidence for the government was that on a certain evening a federal narcotics agent entered the storeroom at the rear of a saloon and removed from between some beer cases a paper containing the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Ng Choy Fong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Henry Rodella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. Stoppelli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  3. Frank Anthony Cellino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. John Roland Phelps v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  5. United States v. PisanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API