Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Sage

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 2015No. 2013-0945PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

{¶ 1} In this case, we determine the fate of a public-records request made by appellee/cross-appellant, the Cincinnati Enquirer. The Enquirer sought the *393recording of an outgoing phone call placed by a Butler County 9-1-1 dispatcher. We find that the recording is a public record under R.C. 149.43. We therefore affirm the court of appeals’ decision holding that the Enquirer was entitled to a writ of mandamus ordering the release of the recording. We also affirm the court’s award of statutory damages to the Enquirer. We find, however, that the court of appeals abused its discretion in not…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  5. Houchins v. KQED, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Hurt v. Liberty Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State ex rel. Rogers v. Dep't of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State ex rel. Kesterson v. Kent State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State ex rel. Kesterson v. Kent State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API