Legal Opinion

Kish v. City of Akron

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2006No. 2004-0738PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} Pursuant to S.CLPrac.R. XVIII(6), we accepted these questions of state law certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit: “What constitutes a ‘record’ as that term is used in Ohio Rev.Code § 149.351?”1 Kish v. *163Akron, 102 Ohio St.3d 1529, 2004-Ohio-3580, 811 N.E.2d 1149, and “What constitutes a ‘violation’ as that term is used in Ohio Rev.Code § 149.351?” Kish v. Akron, 106 Ohio St.3d 1402, 2005-Ohio-3118, 829 N.E.2d 1215.

{¶ 2} We hold that “record,” as used in R.C. 149.351 and defined in R.C. 149.011, may be a single document within a larger file of documents as…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer, Div. of Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc. v. DupuisOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. S.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Jones-KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Hurt v. Liberty Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State Ex Rel. McCaffrey v. Mahoning County Prosecutor's OfficeOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State ex rel. Morgan v. StricklandOhio Supreme Court · 2009

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API