Legal Opinion
Arthur J. Schmitt Foundation v. Stockham Valves & Fittings, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided October 28, 1966No. Civ. A. 63-383PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
GROOMS, District Judge.
This action was submitted for decision after thirty-one days of testimony. Upon such testimony, ■ the exhibits, oral arguments and briefs; and the Court .being fully advised, enters the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law pursuant to Rule 52.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. This is an action brought under the patent laws of the United States, U. S. Code, Title 35 and Title 28, Section 1400(b), and charges infringement of four patents relating to resin-coated sand as used in the making of foundry molds for casting iron and other…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Standard Oil Co. (Indiana) v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Mumm v. Jacob E. Decker & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Kenneth Reiner and Frank A. Klaus, Jr., D/B/A Kaynar Company and Kaynar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. I. Leon Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Eli Lilly and Company, Inc. v. Generix Drug Sales, Inc., Caribe Chemical Company, Inc., Ellencee Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc., (Three Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- Kori Corp. v. Wilco Marsh Buggies & Draglines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1982
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1978
- Maschinenfabrik Rieter A. G. v. Greenwood MillsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.