Legal Opinion

Kenneth Reiner and Frank A. Klaus, Jr., D/B/A Kaynar Company and Kaynar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. I. Leon Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 21, 1960No. 25662_1PublishedCited by 158 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAND, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of Judge Byers, holding invalid for lack of invention claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 10 and 11 of Reissue Patent No. 23,163. We are told that only claims 2 and 3 are in suit. The invention is for “clamps,” used to maintain “formed curls” in a woman’s hair, and the first question is whether the disclosure was an “invention.” The “clamp” consists of two superimposed members, or “jaws,” which open and close at one end under spring pressure, between which, when open, the curl is inserted, and which hold it fast when they are closed. It is difficult to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Dean A. Lyon v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  4. Grubman Engineering & Mfg. Co. v. GoldbergerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931

3Cited by158 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Tee-Pak, Inc. v. St. Regis Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  4. Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  5. Timely Products Corporation, Raphael J. Costanzo v. Stanley ArronCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API