Legal Opinion
Maschinenfabrik Rieter A. G. v. Greenwood Mills
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided March 23, 1972No. Civ. A. 69-824PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BLATT, District Judge.
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
This is a civil action under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 281, for patent infringement of United States Letters Patent Number 3,029,477 (hereafter the '477 patent) entitled “AUTOMATIC CARDING PLANT”. There is no question as to jurisdiction or venue. Defendants admitted in their Answers and Counterclaim that this Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a). Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) as defendant, Greenwood Mills (hereafter “GREENWOOD”) has a regular and established place of business within the District and its…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1974
- ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1974
- Lee A. Turzillo v. P & Z Mergentime, Lee A. Turzillo v. P & Z MergentimeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Lundy Electronics & Systems, Inc. v. Optical Recognition Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.