Legal Opinion

Weems v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided July 14, 2005No. 14-03-01067-CRPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN S. ANDERSON, Justice.

Following the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress, appellant Widener Michael Weems was convicted by a jury of murder and assessed punishment at life in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. He appeals his conviction on a single issue. He contends the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress and admitting his written and videotaped statements and any evidence discovered through those statements because the State failed to prove the police had probable cause to arrest him, and thus, his in-custody statements were…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Paulea v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  2. Ferguson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  3. Weems v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  4. Horhn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API