Ferguson v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN S. ANDERSON, Justice.
A jury found appellant guilty of possession of a prohibited item in a correctional facility, namely, a cell phone. The jury assessed six years’ imprisonment by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (“TDCJ”) for the offense. Appellant, appearing pro se at both the trial and on appeal, raises nine points of error on appeal. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Major Calvin Tucker of the Darrington Unit of the TDCJ testified that on March 14, 2007, he attempted to conduct a routine search of appellant’s cell and person. (3 RR 11) Appellant’s cell mate…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Samuel Espinoza Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Celeste Grynberg and Jack J. Grynberg D/B/A Grynberg Petroleum v. M-I L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2012
- In the MATTER OF M.I.S., a JuvenileCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Darnell A. La Rue McQueen v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2025
- Dexter Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.