Legal Opinion

Wickes v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1936No. 16417PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCALEB, Judge.

This is a contest between rival claimants for the proceeds of an industrial life insurance policy.

We find the facts of the case to be as follows:

On January 5, 1926, one Ralph Duhaney, a colored man, hereinafter referred to as the insured, entered into a contract of endowment and life insurance with the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, by the terms of which, and in consideration of a weekly premium of 50 cents, the insurance company agreed to pay, upon event of his death, to his executor or administrator, the sum of $510.

The policy also contained a “facility of payment…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Quist v. Western & Southern Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Atkinson v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. New York Life Ins. v. MurtaghSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  5. Barrett v. BarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. FaulknerMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Standard Life & Acc. Ins. Co. v. PylantLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Morein v. North American Co. for Life & Health Ins.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Smith v. American National Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Nixon v. Life Insurance Company of VirginiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API