Legal Opinion

Faulkner v. Faulkner

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1942No. 34778PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

Ike Faulkner was an employee of the Mississippi Power & Light Company through which he had procured by virtue of such employment a policy of life insurance with the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Among the provisions of such policy are the following: ‘ ‘ The right to change the beneficiary is reserved,” also “Should you desire to change the beneficiary under the Certificate, your request for such change must be submitted through your employer.” Premiums on such policy were paid by such employer which deducted the amounts therefor from the employee’s wages.

In this policy the beneficiary…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  3. Hall v. AllenMississippi Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Bank of Belzoni v. HodgesMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Wickes v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bell v. ParkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Brown v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wickham v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Stepson v. BrandMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Bonds v. BondsMississippi Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API