Legal Opinion
Barrett v. Barrett
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 17, 1931No. 8045PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the petition or response of Mrs. Bertha M. Barrett. It is true that what was done by the insured in this case did not literally comply with the provisions in the policy for effecting a change of beneficiary: “The insured may, at any time, and from time to time, during the continuance of this policy, with the consent of the company, subject to any assignment of this policy, change the beneficiary or beneficiaries hereunder, by filing at the home office a written request on the company’s form therefor,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Freund v. FreundIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Nally v. NallySupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- Mitchell v. LangleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Smith v. Locomotive Engineers Mutual Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
- Blount v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Faircloth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Mrs. Mae Hester Bohannon v. Manhattan Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Jackson's Atlanta Ready Mix Concrete Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.