Quist v. Western & Southern Life Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.
The husband of plaintiff took out a life insurance policy in defendant company, payable to plaintiff as beneficiary, reserving the right to change the beneficiary. The policy was placed in the hands of plaintiff by her husband and she paid the premiums as they fell due. Just before his death *408the insured, through arrangement with defendant company, constituted his estate beneficiary in place and stead of plaintiff, received from defendant a return of the premiums paid and agreed to a surrender and cancellation of the policy. The policy being in the hands of plaintiff, was not' surrendered, but…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cohen v. SamuelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Freund v. FreundIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Mutual Ben. Life Ins. v. SwettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Indiana National Life Insurance v. McGinnisIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Antley v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Aetna Life Insurance v. BrooksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Davis v. Modern Industrial BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Dogariu v. DogariuMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Fidelity Union Life Insurance Company v. MethvenTexas Supreme Court · 1961
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.