Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 17, 1939No. 32,108PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment entered after defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict for plaintiff was granted.

Plaintiff’s decedent, Gustaf Peterson, a youth of 18% years of age, w'as electrocuted when a tree he was cutting on his father’s property either struck, or came into the immediate vicinity of, high-tension electrical wires maintained by defendant.

Some poles were needed to construct a scaffold along the side of a garage Gustaf and others were shingling. He and his brother went to the pasture to cut a few from a stand of young trees growing near defendant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The GermanicSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Northwestern Marble & Tile Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Aljoe v. Penn Central Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. HubbardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  5. Theisen v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Texas Utilities Electric Co. v. TimmonsTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. TePoel v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Watson, Adm'x v. Virginia Elec., Etc., Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1957
  5. Majerus v. GuelsowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API