Texas Utilities Electric Co. v. Timmons
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHecht, Justice
joined by PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, CORNYN, ENOCH, OWEN, BAKER and ABBOTT, Justices.
The sole question in this ease is whether, as a matter of law, a 90-foot electric transmission tower is an attractive nuisance to a 14-year-old boy. The district court answered no, granting summary judgment for the defendant. The court of appeals answered yes. 917 S.W.2d 84. We agree with the district court.
After spending the evening drinking beer and malt liquor at a friend’s house, Billy Edwin Byrum, age 14, walked • outside and down the street about half a block to a utility tower and began to climb it. The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Burton Construction & Shipbuilding Co. v. BroussardTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Banker v. McLaughlinTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- McCoy v. Texas Power & Light Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Fiess v. State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Lampasas v. Spring Center, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- Boerjan v. RodriguezTexas Supreme Court · 2014
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.