Legal Opinion

Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 19, 1930PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

This suit was brought by the appellee, Nettie Hubbard, to recover damages for personal injuries received from contact with appellee’s high-powered transmission line. There was a judgment in the court below for $5,000 in favor of the appellee, from which this appeal is prosecuted.

’The testimony regarding the alleged negligence of the appellant in the maintenance of its lines is in conflict, that upon the part of the appellant tending to show that the line was properly erected and maintained, the wires being the ordinary and suitable distance above the surface of the ground, having no slack…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. CatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Stackpole v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Riggs v. Standard Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1904
  4. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. CarrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Aljoe v. Penn Central Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Watson, Adm'x v. Virginia Elec., Etc., Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1957
  3. City of Williston v. CribbsSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. Green River Rural Electric Co-Op. Corp. v. BlandfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  5. Peterson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API