Legal Opinion
State v. Hullinger
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 2002No. NonePublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] Pursuant to SDCL 23A-32-5, the State petitioned for an interlocutory appeal from a magistrate court order suppressing evidence of a horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN) test. We granted the petition. The State raises first impression issues regarding admission of the HGN test in prosecutions for driving under the influence in this state. We reverse and remand.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.] On March 18, 2001, Stanley County deputy sheriff David Ludwig observed a red Camaro driving slowly out of Fort Pierre. Ludwig noticed its driver touch the curb and cross the center…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Emerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- State v. Van KirkMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1986
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. DahoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- People v. GallupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- State v. MotzkoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BurkettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. YuelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.