Legal Opinion
State v. Dahood
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 20, 2002No. 99-510PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The defendant, Michael Dahood, appeals his conviction for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, second offense, see RSA 265:82-b (1993 & Supp. 2002), following a jury trial in the Concord District Court. The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test, as administered in New Hampshire, is admissible at trial. We hold that the test is admissible and affirm the defendant’s conviction.
This is the second time this case has reached us on appeal. See State v. Dahood, 143 N.H. 471 (1999) (Dahood I). In discussing the facts of this case, we…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Emerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. ShaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Marsh v. ValyouSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- State v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. LangillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- State v. PelletierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.