Legal Opinion

State v. Van Kirk

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 2001No. 99-413PublishedCited by 210 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 On January 19, 1999, a jury convicted Marvin Van Kirk (Van Kirk) of four criminal offenses: driving under the influence of alcohol, failing to carry proof of vehicle registration, operating a motor vehicle without liability insurance, and driving a vehicle with a suspended or revoked driver's license. Van Kirk appeals his convictions to this Court. We affirm.

¶2 Van Kirk raises three issues on appeal:

1. Did the District Court correctly conclude that the arresting officer had a particularized suspicion to initially stop Van Kirk's vehicle?

2. Did the District Court properly conclude that Van…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by210 opinions

  1. State v. DerbyshireMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. GoodMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. MizenkoMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. FergusonMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. HardawayMontana Supreme Court · 2001

205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API