Legal Opinion

Norville v. Palant

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 27, 1976No. 2 CA-CIV 1941PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KRUCKER, Judge.

This is an appeal by cross-claimants Allan J. Norville and Financial Associates, Inc. (hereinafter collectively denominated “Norville”) from a judgment rendered in favor of cross-claim defendants Edythe Palant and First Realty and Investment Co. (hereinafter “Palant”), and Lew S. McGinnis and Credit Finance Co. (hereinafter “McGinnis”). The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and after finding that there was no just reason for delay, specifically directed entry of judgment on the cross-claim. Rule 54(b), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S.

Taken in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re McDonnell's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Vivian Arnold Realty Co. v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  3. Mead v. HummelArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Warren v. Mangels RealtyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alaface v. National Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. Harben v. HuttonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  4. Musselman v. Southwinds Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Century 21 Quality Properties, Inc. v. ChandlerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API