Legal Opinion

Vivian Arnold Realty Co. v. McCormick

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 6, 1973No. 2 CA-CIV 1226PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge.

Subsequent to the trial court’s denial of a motion for a new trial, defendants-appellants Vivian Arnold, individually, and Vivian Arnold Realty Company appealed. The trial court, sitting without a jury, made a ruling declaring a deposit and receipt agreement to be void and that the $500 earnest money deposit be returned to the purchasers, plaintiffs-appellees McCormick. The trial court also entered judgment in favor of (1) the sellers, defendants-appellees Osborne, against the appellants, who had been made defendants on a cross-claim by Osborne, in the amount of $500 for damages…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dietel v. DayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  2. Jennings v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Jerger v. RubinArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. City of Phoenix v. FineCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Tester v. TesterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  2. Marmis v. Solot Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Ness v. Greater Arizona Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  5. Coleman v. WattsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API