Legal Opinion
Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 20, 1987No. 1 CA-CIV 8804PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREER, Judge.
The primary issue presented in this appeal is whether a real estate agent who is *587an employee of the seller owes a duty of full and frank disclosure to the buyer in a real estate transaction. A secondary issue is whether an award of attorneys’ fees pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-341.01 was proper.
Since this is an appeal from a summary judgment, we view the facts most favorably to the appellant. The appellant, Meredith Haldiman, entered into a contract on August 5, 1982, to purchase a townhome, which was to be constructed by appellee Gosnell Development Corporation (Gosnell). The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Noble v. National American Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Larry's ApartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN RANCH COMMUNITY ASS'N v. SimonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Aranki v. RKP Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Galam v. CarmelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.