Legal Opinion

Composite Laminates, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 15, 1992No. 91-879CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

BACKGROUND

This case comes before the court on the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment, which defendant opposes.1 The plaintiff requests the court to convert the Navy’s termination for default issued in this case by the contracting officer into one for convenience, and to award appropriate damages, plus interest, fees and costs. The plaintiff, Composite Laminates, Inc. (Composite) has been a commercial and government contractor since 1983, with its principle place of business in Long Beach, California.

FACTS

For the purposes of this decision on plaintiff’s motion…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Becho, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  2. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary of the Navy v. Aec CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  3. SIPCO Services & Marine Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  5. Hannon Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API