Legal Opinion
Richard J. Danzig, Secretary of the Navy v. Aec Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 25, 2000No. 99-1343PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
The dispute in this case arose when the government terminated its contract with AEC Corporation for default. The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals ruled that the default termination was improper, and the government has appealed from that ruling. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
In May 1989, the Navy awarded AEC a contract to complete the construction of a Naval and Marine Corps Reserve Training Center in Miami, Florida. The contract called for AEC to finish the work by October 14, 1990. By late 1990, it was apparent that AEC was behind schedule. AEC…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Dingley v. OlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Cascade Pacific International v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Discount Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Kennedy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Tecom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation, and General Dynamics Corporation v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Securiforce International America, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Fredericksburg Non-Profit Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Empire Energy Management Systems, Inc. v. James G. Roche, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.