Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Marsh
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 17, 1929No. Docket No. 6808PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.
The defendants, Robert Marsh and F. L. Marsh, appeal from an order of the court denying their motion for a change of the place of trial of the action from the city and county of San Francisco to the county of Los Angeles, their place of residence. The complaint was filed in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The defendants are Robert Marsh, F. L. Marsh, S. L. Steele and Venice Island Land Company. The action is brought to recover upon a debt contracted by the defendant corporation. There were two causes of action stated in the complaint, an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brady v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- McClung v. WattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Maguire v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Donohoe v. WoosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Griffin & Skelly Co. v. Magnolia & Healdsburg Fruit Cannery Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. HubbardDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
- Kane v. MendenhallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Peters v. BigelowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Independent Iron Works, Inc. v. American President Lines, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.