Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hubbard
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 22, 1938No. 1262-YPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
The amended bill of complaint for declaratory relief shows these facts: Joe Petronovich owned a Ford automobile in Gallup, New Mexico, and had obtained from the defendant Employers Liability Assurance Company (to whom we shall refer as “the defendant-insurer”) a policy of public liability insurance which contained an omnibus clause extending the coverage to any person operating the automobile with the owner’s permission. The defendant L. K. Blackwell borrowed the automobile, and, while driving it in Gallup, New Mexico, with the owner’s consent, struck and injured the…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Hill v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Consumers Finance Service, Inc. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. YeattsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Trinity Universal Insurance v. WillrichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Kress v. CoreyNevada Supreme Court · 1948
- American Automobile Insurance Co. v. EnglishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.