Richardson Lumber Co. v. Hoey
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.
On the 16th day of September, 1916, the parties hereto made the following contract for the sale and purchase of a quantity of ties:
‘Alpena, Michigan, September 16, 1916.
“Western Cedar & Lumber Company,
“City.
“Gentlemen: We will sell you the cedar ties we
Slow have on the Boyce property, Essexville, estimated 'to be 11,500 at! 42c on the ground as they are. This to be for all — there are to be no rejects. You are to pay us in cash as soon as the ties have been counted. We have made this in duplicate and if you wish to purchase the same kindly sign your acceptance to one copy and return it to us,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sherwood v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Lingham v. EgglestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Adams Mining Co. v. SenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Whitcomb v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Germain v. LoudMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lenawee County Board of Health v. MesserlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Gordon v. City of Warren Planning & Urban Renewal CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Morgan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
- Banking & Trading Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Farhat v. RasseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.