Legal Opinion
Banking & Trading Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 30, 1956PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, District Judge.
Plaintiff, an Indonesian corporation, claims for the purchase price of a cargo of rubber which it allegedly sold Rubber Development Corporation, a now dissolved subsidiary of the defendant, and which was confiscated by the Dutch during its attempted exportation from Indonesia. It claims that the exchange of communications between its commission merchant, Isbrandtsen Incorporated, and R. D. C. constituted a contract for the sale and that by loading the rubber on Isbrandtsen’s ship in Java it completed performance under the contract. In the alternative it claims for goods…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway v. Columbus Rolling MillSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Mississippi & Dominion Steamship Co. v. SwiftSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
- Madeirense Do Brasil S/A v. Stulman-Emrick Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
- Saul Freedman, D/B/A M. & E. Equipment & Parts Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Freedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Banking & Trading Corp. v. FloeteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Banking & Trading Corporation v. FloeteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.