Legal Opinion

Whitcomb v. Whitney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1872PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Wayne Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The main facts in this case are undisputed. On tbe sixteenth day of March, 1871, the parties made a contract evidenced by tbe following writing:

*487“Detroit, March 16, 1871/
“Beeeived .of D. Whitney Jr. five hundred dollars on account for all. the upper qualities and select common and cutting up or fine common lumber that I make at Bock Falls in town of Sand Beach, Michigan, this season, at fair price, what said Whitney can afford to pay; the^ lumber is to be delivered on rail of vessel when lumber is ready to ship, or when vessel is ready to send for it. '

(Signed) “ Hiram Whitcomb.”

The defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Andrews v. . DurantNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Olyphant v. BakerNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Comfort v. KierstedNew York Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lingham v. EgglestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Germain v. LoudMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Martz v. PutnamIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. People ex rel. Holmes v. SheehanMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Ferguson v. ArthurMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API