Legal Opinion

Farhat v. Rassey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1940No. Docket No. 27, Calendar No. 41,106PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Plaintiff filed a bill for the dissolution of a partnership and for an accounting. The case was submitted on the proofs in December, 1939, and on January 18, 1940, at about 9 o’clock in the morning, the trial court filed a written opinion in which he found that plaintiff was entitled to $3,933.33 as his share of the assets of the copartnership which totalled $11,297.68. On the same morning, the attorney for defendants called plaintiff’s attorney and suggested that defendants would pay .$1,400 to settle the case if an agreement could be effected that day. Plaintiff’s attorney went to Flint,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Sherwood v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Kutsche v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Kirl v. ZinnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State Savings Bank v. BuhlMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lenawee County Board of Health v. MesserlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Harbor Insurance Company v. StokesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  3. Gordon v. City of Warren Planning & Urban Renewal CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Harbor Insurance v. StokesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  5. Gordon v. City of Warren Planning & Urban Renewal CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API