Legal Opinion
Estey & Associates, Inc. v. McCulloch Corp.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 14, 1986No. Civ. 83-1416-REPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REDDEN, District Judge:
Plaintiff brings this suit against defendants McCulloch and Black & Decker on account of the termination of the distributorship relationship between McCulloch and plaintiff on September 1, 1983. A series of antitrust claims have been asserted to broaden the attack. McCulloch in turn has made a counterclaim against plaintiff. Defendants move for summary judgment on all the claims, and on the counterclaim. Summary judgment is granted in each case for defendants.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Estey & Associates, Inc., a distributor, does business as Lucky JT Distributing Co.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Baltimore Luggage Co. v. HoltzmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Hokto Kinoko Co. v. Concord Farms, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Lund v. Arbonne International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- M. Leff Radio Parts, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Gall Landau Young Construction Co. v. HedreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.