Legal Opinion
Lund v. Arbonne International, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 21, 1994No. 91-3659-L-1; CA A82007PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Plaintiff brought this action against defendant Arbonne International, Inc. (Arbonne), for, inter alia, breach of contract, violation of the Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA), ORS 646.605 et seq, interference with business relations and defamation. Plaintiff alleged claims against defendants Raker and Vollstedt for defamation and intentional interference with contractual relations. The trial court granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment. We affirm.
Arbonne is a company that develops and produces beauty and skin care products that are marketed through “consultants.” To become a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Best v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Lewis v. Oregon Beauty Supply Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Yartzoff v. Democrat-Herald Pub. Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Klamath Off-Project Water Users, Inc. v. PacifiCorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Kraemer v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Pollock v. DR Horton, Inc.-PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Lansford v. Georgetown Manor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Sharma v. Providence Health & Services-OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.